Monday, October 6, 2025
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
No Result
View All Result

in Court Updates, DRM Exclusive, News

PECA S.20 Amendment will not stand, Attorney General tells Islamabad High Court

DRMby DRM
March 10, 2022

March 10, 2022 – While extending the order prohibiting the arrests under Section 20 of the recently passed PECA Amendment Ordinance, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) has requested the Attorney General to advise the court on Monday, March 14. The Attorney General told the court today that the potential abuse of the law, i.e. Section 20 of PECA that criminalises defamation was realised when PECA Ordinance was signed. Prime Minister Imran Khan was informed about the legislation who expressed concern regarding the abuse, and asked, “How did it happen?” The Attorney General told the court that the Prime Minister was informed that this was a mistake, while regardless he has already said that the PECA Ordinance will have draconian impact if it is implemented in current form. The Attorney General said that the decision to do consultation with stakeholders on this has already been made.

He further stated that the implementation of the amendments under Section 20 has already been halted. Chief Justice Athar Minallah remarked that all the politicians and vloggers will also be behind bars if the amendments in section 20 are allowed to remain in place.

This was said during the hearing of clubbed petitions filed by various parties, including Pakistan Broadcasters Association (PBA), Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ), Council of Pakistan Newspaper Editors (CPNE) and others to challenge the PECA Amendment Ordinances signed by the President on February 18, 2022. The Ordinance has attracted a fair share of attention and criticism from various stakeholders, including civil society, journalist community, opposition political parties and general public, for its ability to muzzle freedom of expression and criticism of government and state policies in the country. The Ordinance amends section 20 of the parent Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) that criminalises defamation, and broadens the scope of the law to grant protection to public officials, institutions and departments as compared to just aggrieved individuals or “natural persons.”

The Attorney General, on Thursday, told the Court that by removing the term “natural person” from section 20, the PECA Ordinance has enabled all institutions and departments to file complaints as well, and added that this amendment will not stand. He said that the government will take PFUJ, PBA, CPNE and all other relevant stakeholders on board for consultation. He also mentioned that the decision by the Court to not process any case under the Amendment Ordinance will be respected. Chief Justice Athar Minallah said that freedom of speech and free press are important.

#BREAKING: “Indian courts upheld criminalisation of defamation but this court (IHC) won’t let #Pakistan to become #India,” observed CJ IHC #JusticeAtharMinallah

— Asad Ali Toor (@AsadAToor) March 10, 2022

Reiterating the remarks from the hearing on March 1 regarding the abuse of power under PECA by the FIA, the Chief Justice remarked that the Director FIA must tell the Court why the agency prioritised the complaint filed by PTI MNA Kanwal Shozab when there were 95,000 complaints still pending. Kanwal Shozab said that she was subjected to character assassination at the hands of her neighbour who raised an environmental matter in the neighbourhood, while her lawyer said in the court at the time that she was slandered, the Islamic punishment for which is stone pelting.

Chief Justice Athar Minallah said that all of this is happening because of the political parties. Every political party has social media teams, what are they for? Are they working to initiate campaigns against judges and other people, the Court asked. It remarked that these issues will be resolved if all political parties decide that none of their followers will be disrespectful on social media.

The PFUJ lawyer who was present during the hearing, said that the Attorney General has already said that he does not defend half of the PECA Ordinance, and we are ready to sit with him to consult on the Ordinance. Whereas, Advocate Imaan Mazari raised the question of why the government did not consult stakeholders before passing amendments as Ordinance? Chief Justice Athar Minallah remarked that it is possible that the Ordinance is reversed if all stakeholders consult on the matter.

The next hearing on the application is fixed on March 14, 2022.

Tags: DefamationFreedom of ExpressionPakistanPECAPECA OrdinanceSection 20
Previous Post

Prime Minister has not been advised correctly about PECA, says Islamabad High Court

Next Post

Right to Information (RTI)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
NCCIA charges three YouTubers for promoting illegal gambling apps

PTA blocks 139 websites and accounts selling citizens’ personal data

October 5, 2025
PTCL gets regulatory green light to acquire Telenor Pakistan

PTCL gets regulatory green light to acquire Telenor Pakistan

October 1, 2025
Senate panel told FBR drafting tax plan for TikTok content creators

Senate panel told FBR drafting tax plan for TikTok content creators

September 28, 2025
No Content Available

Next Post
How do Social Media Rules Impact Civil Liberties in Pakistan?

Right to Information (RTI)

About Digital Rights Monitor

This website reports on digital rights and internet governance issues in Pakistan and collates related resources and publications. The site is a part of Media Matters for Democracy’s Report Digital Rights initiative that aims to improve reporting on digital rights issues through engagement with media outlets and journalists.

About Media Matters for Democracy

Media Matters for Democracy is a Pakistan based not-for-profit geared towards independent journalism and media and digital rights advocacy. Founded by a group of journalists, MMfD works for innovation in media and journalism through the use of technology, research, and advocacy on media and internet related issues. MMfD works to ensure that expression and information rights and freedoms are protected in Pakistan.

Follow Us on Twitter

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements