Friday, September 12, 2025
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
No Result
View All Result

in DRM Exclusive, News

Inconceivable how a tweet can incite mutiny in army, remarks IHC

DRMby DRM
November 14, 2022

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) quashed on Saturday a case registered by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) against a citizen for allegedly defaming the armed forces on Twitter, remarking the FIA exceeded its jurisdiction by registering such a case.

The order, a copy of which is available with Digital Rights Monitor (DRM), was issued by IHC Justice Babar Sattar, who quashed the case with no offences observed on the part of the petitioner. 

“It is inconceivable how the publication of the tweet from an insignificant Twitter account can cause or incite officers of the military to mutiny or otherwise disregard their duties,” the court remarked. “It is equally inconceivable how such tweet could cause fear or alarm within public causing a member of such public to commit an offence against the state or against the public.”

The case was registered under Sections 500 (punishment for defamation), 501 (printing or engraving matter known to be defamatory), and 505 (statements conducing to public mischief) of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) for a tweet allegedly against COAS Qamar Javed Bajwa and the army. Justice Sattar questioned the FIA’s authority to register the case, noting the agency lacked the jurisdiction to take cognisance of complaints filed under Section 505 of the PPC.

According to the order, the petitioner denied the ownership of the Twitter account from which the tweet was made; therefore, the court could not get involved in the determination of a factual controversy in its constitutional jurisdiction. 

“The words published [in the tweet] simply do not attract the provisions of Sections 500, 501, or 505 of the PPC,” said Justice Babar. “Even otherwise, Article 19 of the Constitution guarantees every person the right to freedom of speech and expression.”

He added no one in their right mind can consider that an insignificant tweet such as one attributed to the petitioner is capable of threatening the security or defence of Pakistan.

The court also termed the registration of the FIR “an abuse of the process of law aimed at enforcing illegal censorship of speech”.

The FIA has been repeatedly called out by rights activists for attempting to curtail citizens’ right to freedom of expression on the internet in Pakistan. 

Tags: IHCTwitter
Previous Post

Musk mayhem: Key security, privacy leaders quit Twitter

Next Post

Google agrees to pay $392m in privacy settlement

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

September 11, 2025
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

September 11, 2025
Afghan refugee children at Girdi Jungle refugee camp. Photo credits: Ramna Saeed

Pakistan blocks SIMS of Afghan refugees after deportation deadline

September 9, 2025
No Content Available

Next Post
Google Sued Over ‘Unlawful’ Biometric Data Collection

Google agrees to pay $392m in privacy settlement

About Digital Rights Monitor

This website reports on digital rights and internet governance issues in Pakistan and collates related resources and publications. The site is a part of Media Matters for Democracy’s Report Digital Rights initiative that aims to improve reporting on digital rights issues through engagement with media outlets and journalists.

About Media Matters for Democracy

Media Matters for Democracy is a Pakistan based not-for-profit geared towards independent journalism and media and digital rights advocacy. Founded by a group of journalists, MMfD works for innovation in media and journalism through the use of technology, research, and advocacy on media and internet related issues. MMfD works to ensure that expression and information rights and freedoms are protected in Pakistan.

Follow Us on Twitter

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements