Saturday, September 13, 2025
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
No Result
View All Result

in DRM Exclusive, News

Petition filed to challenge government’s inability to uphold right to privacy in Pakistan

Hija Kamranby Hija Kamran
December 9, 2019

Photo by Parker Coffman on Unsplash

Photo by Parker Coffman on Unsplash

December 9, 2019 – The Islamabad High Court (IHC) issued notices to the Federal Government last month, under a petition titled “S. Khan Vs Federation of Pakistan”. The petition aims to challenge the government’s inability to uphold citizens’ right to privacy granted under Article 14: Inviolability of dignity of man etc, of the Constitution of Pakistan. The petition questions, in general, various projects by the government and corporations that infringe on citizens’ privacy, and in particular, the video surveillance through CCTV cameras and mobile and spy cameras.

The petition maintains that the videos collected through these cameras are then circulated within WhatsApp groups and elsewhere on the internet, and often used to blackmail and coerce women which has devastating effect not only on their physical safety but also has long lasting implications on their psychological well being.

It highlights that this breach of privacy is not limited to the data collected and processed by private institutions, in fact, a large number of this data is acquired by the government agencies as well. This data is particularly sensitive in nature, containing not only the names, phone numbers, home addresses of the citizens, but also their biometric, banking and criminal records. While this data is collected and restored, citizens remain oblivious of its collection, how it is stored and processed, and who has access to it.

The petition further states that this is not just a matter of individual safety of the citizens, but the data collected through digital technology can interfere with how the government is formed and functions, an example of which was seen during the US Presidential Elections of 2016 when Facebook’s data was used to meddle with voters’ decision.

The main purpose to file this petition is to mobilise the government to employ a strong data protection legislation that does not necessitate data controlled and processed by private institutions to be protected but also the data acquired, stored and processed by the government agencies as well.

S. Khan the petitioner under this case, says, “In the absence of a strong data protection law, the personal and sensitive data of the citizens will constantly be at the risk of being breached and abused. The implications of such violations translate differently for women as compared to men; and in our society where women have constantly been seen as ‘honour’ and not a human being, the compromised data can put them under serious physical and psychological harm.”

The petition prays, among others, that IHC directs the respondents to ensure citizens are duly informed wherever the surveillance cameras are installed; immediately enact an appropriate data protection law; acknowledges person’s data be directly linked to their fundamental right to privacy and dignity under Article 14; and declares that a person’s data, digital or otherwise, is the exclusive property of the person.

Tags: CharahgarData protectionPakistanprivacysurveillance
Previous Post

Kashmiris Are Disappearing From WhatsApp

Next Post

Indian network behind disinformation campaigns against Pakistan exposed

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

September 11, 2025
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

September 11, 2025
Afghan refugee children at Girdi Jungle refugee camp. Photo credits: Ramna Saeed

Pakistan blocks SIMS of Afghan refugees after deportation deadline

September 9, 2025
No Content Available

Next Post

Indian network behind disinformation campaigns against Pakistan exposed

About Digital Rights Monitor

This website reports on digital rights and internet governance issues in Pakistan and collates related resources and publications. The site is a part of Media Matters for Democracy’s Report Digital Rights initiative that aims to improve reporting on digital rights issues through engagement with media outlets and journalists.

About Media Matters for Democracy

Media Matters for Democracy is a Pakistan based not-for-profit geared towards independent journalism and media and digital rights advocacy. Founded by a group of journalists, MMfD works for innovation in media and journalism through the use of technology, research, and advocacy on media and internet related issues. MMfD works to ensure that expression and information rights and freedoms are protected in Pakistan.

Follow Us on Twitter

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements