Saturday, October 25, 2025
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
No Result
View All Result

in DRM Exclusive, News

The Wire Takes Down Contentious Meta Reporting

DRMby DRM
October 20, 2022
Meta vs The Wire: Everything you need to know

October 20, 2022 – Indian news publication The Wire has taken down its series of investigative reports detailing the alleged privileges Facebook’s parent company Meta granted to a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader under its “Cross-Check” or “XCheck” programme.

The reports claimed BJP leader Amit Malviya, who heads the party’s IT cell, was exempt from Meta’s enforcement rules under the XCheck programme and that the Instagram posts he reported were removed without any review. After the reports went viral, Meta’s top executives Andy Stone, the communications director, and Guy Rosen, the security chief, hit back at Wire, terming the organisation’s reporting “a fabrication”.

Related: Meta vs The Wire: Everything You Need To Know

After initially defending its investigation, Wire has taken down the reports while it conducts an internal review of the material. 

“This [internal assessment] will include a review of all documents, source material and sources used for our stories on Meta,” Wire said. “Based on our sources’ consent, we are also exploring the option of sharing original files with trusted and reputed domain experts as part of this process.”

The review comes in the wake of concerns from a number of tech experts and media executives, who questioned the authenticity of Wire’s evidence, especially the “internal” documents that were published to support the XCheck claims and the screenshot of an email the publication claimed Stone had sent to his team. 

“In this period, the reports in question will be withheld from public view. Based on our findings, we will determine a future course of action and inform our readers as well, and promise to act – as always – in their best interests,” the statement added. “We understand that our editorial and technical processes for these articles require scrutiny. Our internal review will also draw upon external expertise.”

Related: Explainer: Meta vs The Wire

Some experts raised concerns that Wire possibly fell victim to an internal ruse, but others supported its reporting, bringing up Meta’s past content moderation controversies and discriminatory policies. In an October 17 statement, Wire announced it would not publish any further “corroborative evidence” that could expose its sources to Meta. 

Tags: MetaThe Wire
Previous Post

Pakistan sees no significant progress on internet freedom, report highlights

Next Post

Take the Lead – Episode 03

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
کاشف “پیپسی” کی موت کی وجہ۔ ایچ آئی وی یا معاشرتی نفرت؟

کاشف “پیپسی” کی موت کی وجہ۔ ایچ آئی وی یا معاشرتی نفرت؟

October 24, 2025
چیٹ جی پی ٹی: مصنوعی ذہانت کا حامل چیٹ باٹ یا خواتین کے لیے نفسیاتی معالج؟

چیٹ جی پی ٹی: مصنوعی ذہانت کا حامل چیٹ باٹ یا خواتین کے لیے نفسیاتی معالج؟

October 24, 2025
NCCIA charges three YouTubers for promoting illegal gambling apps

Senior cybercrime officer abducted in Islamabad, six NCCIA officials reported ‘missing’ so far

October 21, 2025
No Content Available

Next Post
Take the Lead – Episode 03

Take the Lead - Episode 03

About Digital Rights Monitor

This website reports on digital rights and internet governance issues in Pakistan and collates related resources and publications. The site is a part of Media Matters for Democracy’s Report Digital Rights initiative that aims to improve reporting on digital rights issues through engagement with media outlets and journalists.

About Media Matters for Democracy

Media Matters for Democracy is a Pakistan based not-for-profit geared towards independent journalism and media and digital rights advocacy. Founded by a group of journalists, MMfD works for innovation in media and journalism through the use of technology, research, and advocacy on media and internet related issues. MMfD works to ensure that expression and information rights and freedoms are protected in Pakistan.

Follow Us on Twitter

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements