Saturday, September 13, 2025
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
No Result
View All Result

in DRM Exclusive, Features

Meta ad practices ruled illegal under EU law

Usman Shahidby Usman Shahid
January 5, 2023
MMfD expresses concern over Facebook’s continuing failure to detect hate speech in ads

Photo: DRM Archives

Facebook’s parent organisation Meta has been fined $414 million by European Union regulators over the company’s “illegal” use of personal data for targeted advertising. 

The fines were announced by Ireland’s privacy watchdog Data Protection Commission (DPC) on Wednesday. According to the regulator, Meta’s leading social media platforms Facebook and Instagram breached transparency obligations laid out in the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) by forcing users to opt for personalised advertisements. The ruling surrounds Meta’s particular practice of gathering personal information which is used to target personalised adverts. 

The multi-billion dollar business, which involves tracking a user’s online activity, has been called out time and time again by critics of the Big Tech and regulators, and constitutes a significant portion of revenues generated by Meta.

The case brought to widespread attention Meta’s terms-of-service agreement that users have to accept in order to sign up on its platforms (Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram). The statement gives a user the options to either agree to the terms or stop using Meta services. The regulators have termed the language used to ask for permission to collect personal information “unlawful” as “users had insufficient clarity as to what processing operations were being carried out on their personal data.” The DPC had reportedly finalised its decision in December.

Meta will have to pay about $233 million for privacy violations on Facebook and $191 million for similar breaches on Instagram.

The firm has also been directed to align its data processing practices with the EU rules within three months. Meta has, however, expressed disappointment over the DPC’s decision and intends to appeal against it.

“We strongly believe our approach respects GDPR, and we’re therefore disappointed by these decisions and intend to appeal both the substance of the rulings and the fines,” Meta said in a detailed blog post published on Wednesday. “There has also been inaccurate speculation and misreporting on what these decisions mean. We want to reassure users and businesses that they can continue to benefit from personalised advertising across the EU through Meta’s platforms.”

The past year has been a tough one for Meta, which saw both a significant increase in regulatory scrutiny and drastic declines in revenues. The company, roiled by massive layoffs and decreasing popularity, has been scrambling to get back its position as the top player of the tech industry. In November, Meta was fined $275 million by the DPC for failure to prevent the massive 2019 data breach. On the whole, the firm has been slapped with fines amounting to more than a billion dollars in less than a year by the Irish watchdog, which also regulates Google, TikTok, Amazon, and other corporations whose EU headquarters are located in Ireland.

The DPC’s latest ruling has been hailed by critics as a historic win for Meta consumers, but it has yet to be seen what impact it will demonstrate on the tech giant’s advertisement business.

Tags: MetaPersonalised Ads
Previous Post

Twitter relaxing ban on political ads

Next Post

SHC orders blocking of defamatory online content about actor Kubra Khan

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

September 11, 2025
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

September 11, 2025
Afghan refugee children at Girdi Jungle refugee camp. Photo credits: Ramna Saeed

Pakistan blocks SIMS of Afghan refugees after deportation deadline

September 9, 2025
No Content Available

Next Post

SHC orders blocking of defamatory online content about actor Kubra Khan

About Digital Rights Monitor

This website reports on digital rights and internet governance issues in Pakistan and collates related resources and publications. The site is a part of Media Matters for Democracy’s Report Digital Rights initiative that aims to improve reporting on digital rights issues through engagement with media outlets and journalists.

About Media Matters for Democracy

Media Matters for Democracy is a Pakistan based not-for-profit geared towards independent journalism and media and digital rights advocacy. Founded by a group of journalists, MMfD works for innovation in media and journalism through the use of technology, research, and advocacy on media and internet related issues. MMfD works to ensure that expression and information rights and freedoms are protected in Pakistan.

Follow Us on Twitter

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements