Monday, September 15, 2025
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
No Result
View All Result

in DRM Exclusive, News

Google Sued Over ‘Unlawful’ Biometric Data Collection

DRMby DRM
October 25, 2022
Google Sued Over ‘Unlawful’ Biometric Data Collection

Photo: DRM Archives

October 21, 2022 – Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit against tech giant Google for allegedly violating the state’s biometric data laws, claiming the company harvested and used biometric data from millions of users without obtaining proper consent.

The case, filed under the Texas Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act, says the state has prohibited companies from gathering consumers’ voice, facial recognition or other biometric information without proper consent for more than a decade. Google’s alleged collection of Texans’ biometric data has been called a “blatant defiance” of the law.

“Google has, since at least 2015, collected biometric data from innumerable Texans and used their faces and their voices to serve Google’s commercial ends,” the complaint says. “Indeed, all across the state, everyday Texans have become unwitting cash cows being milked by Google for profits.”

Google stored voiceprints and facial recognition information through its products, including Google Assistant and Google Photos, which, according to the complaint, use technology to detect biometric identifiers. When pictures are uploaded to Google Photos, it creates a record or face template that determines whether the newly uploaded photos fit the templates created previously. Google then groups together any photos and videos that depict similar faces, thereby storing the information on individual users.

“The proliferation of the commercialisation of Texans’ personal biometric identifiers is as invasive as it is dangerous,” reads the complaint. “Unlike passwords, credit cards, Social Security numbers, and even names, biometric identifiers (like face geometry and voiceprints) form an inherent part of our unique, human identity and cannot be simply erased or replaced when stolen.”

Google has, however, denied the allegations in a statement, calling Paxton’s lawsuit a mischaracterisation of Google products.

“Google Photos helps you organise pictures of people, by grouping similar faces, so you can easily find old photos,” said Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda. “Of course, this is only visible to you and you can easily turn off this feature if you choose and we do not use photos or videos in Google Photos for advertising purposes.”

“The same is true for Voice Match and Face Match on Nest Hub Max, which are off-by-default features that give users the option to let Google Assistant recognize their voice or face to show their information.”

Google will set the record straight in court, the statement added.

Earlier this year, AG Paxton brought a similar case against Facebook’s parent organisation Meta, accusing the social media giant of unlawfully collecting facial recognition data for commercial purposes.

“Facebook will no longer take advantage of people and their children with the intent to turn a profit at the expense of one’s safety and well-being,” Paxton had said in a statement. “This is yet another example of Big Tech’s deceitful business practices and it must stop. I will continue to fight for Texans’ privacy and security.”

Updated with Google’s statement

Tags: GoogleTexas
Previous Post

Meta, TikTok Approving Ads With ‘Blatant’ Election Misinformation

Next Post

India Fines Google $113M Over ‘Unfair’ Payment Policies

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

September 11, 2025
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

September 11, 2025
Afghan refugee children at Girdi Jungle refugee camp. Photo credits: Ramna Saeed

Pakistan blocks SIMS of Afghan refugees after deportation deadline

September 9, 2025
No Content Available

Next Post
India Fines Google $113M Over ‘Unfair’ Payment Policies

India Fines Google $113M Over 'Unfair' Payment Policies

About Digital Rights Monitor

This website reports on digital rights and internet governance issues in Pakistan and collates related resources and publications. The site is a part of Media Matters for Democracy’s Report Digital Rights initiative that aims to improve reporting on digital rights issues through engagement with media outlets and journalists.

About Media Matters for Democracy

Media Matters for Democracy is a Pakistan based not-for-profit geared towards independent journalism and media and digital rights advocacy. Founded by a group of journalists, MMfD works for innovation in media and journalism through the use of technology, research, and advocacy on media and internet related issues. MMfD works to ensure that expression and information rights and freedoms are protected in Pakistan.

Follow Us on Twitter

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements