Monday, September 15, 2025
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
No Result
View All Result

in DRM Exclusive, News

The Wire Apologises For Retracted Meta Reporting

DRMby DRM
October 27, 2022
Meta vs The Wire: Everything you need to know

October 27, 2022 – Indian news outlet The Wire, which published and later retracted a series of investigative reports on Facebook-parent Meta, has apologised citing “deception” by a staff member involved in the contentious reporting.

The controversial stories were officially retracted last week and a review of the entire Meta investigation was announced by the publication.

“Had we done this [verification] before publication rather than after the fact, this would have ensured that the deception to which we were subjected by a member of our Meta investigation team* was spotted in time,” says Wire in its latest statement.

The publication is also conducting a comprehensive review of the internal editorial processes that led to the publication of the disputed Meta stories, it adds.

“The Wire acknowledges that the internal editorial processes which preceded publication of these stories did not meet the standards that The Wire sets for itself and its readers expect from it,” the statement reads. “To have rushed to publish a story we believed was reliable without having the associated technical evidence vetted independently is a failure of which we cannot permit repetition.”

“This combination of not fully grasping the complexities of technology and a slippage in editorial assessment of tech-related matter resulted in the publication of stories which did not eventually hold up. For this we owe an apology to our readers.”

The controversial stories surrounded claims about Meta’s “XCheck” programme which, according to the news outlet, granted content moderation privileges to Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Amit Malviya on Instagram. The stories alleged Meta exempted Malviya from the company’s enforcement rules and the posts reported by him were taken down without any review. 

Wire suspended its reporting after questions mounted on the authenticity of certain pieces of evidence cited in the investigation. 

Wire’s evidence included an internal document related to the ‘XCheck’ programme and a screenshot the publication claimed Andy Stone, Meta’s communications director, had sent to his team inquiring how the XCheck document was leaked. Both pieces of evidence attracted significant scrutiny from industry experts, who pointed out several discrepancies and questioned the credibility of Wire’s sources.

The controversy gained widespread attention, making it to the headlines of several international news publications.

For a complete breakdown of Meta vs The Wire controversy, watch this explainer.

Tags: MetaThe Wire
Previous Post

India Fines Google $113M Over ‘Unfair’ Payment Policies

Next Post

Top Executives Fired After Musk Takes Over Twitter: Reports

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

September 11, 2025
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

September 11, 2025
Afghan refugee children at Girdi Jungle refugee camp. Photo credits: Ramna Saeed

Pakistan blocks SIMS of Afghan refugees after deportation deadline

September 9, 2025
No Content Available

Next Post
Elon Musk's Twitter deal on hold

Top Executives Fired After Musk Takes Over Twitter: Reports

About Digital Rights Monitor

This website reports on digital rights and internet governance issues in Pakistan and collates related resources and publications. The site is a part of Media Matters for Democracy’s Report Digital Rights initiative that aims to improve reporting on digital rights issues through engagement with media outlets and journalists.

About Media Matters for Democracy

Media Matters for Democracy is a Pakistan based not-for-profit geared towards independent journalism and media and digital rights advocacy. Founded by a group of journalists, MMfD works for innovation in media and journalism through the use of technology, research, and advocacy on media and internet related issues. MMfD works to ensure that expression and information rights and freedoms are protected in Pakistan.

Follow Us on Twitter

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements