Monday, September 15, 2025
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
No Result
View All Result

in DRM Exclusive, News

Twitter Reviewing Policies Around Permanent User Ban

DRMby DRM
October 12, 2022
Pakistan ‘Seriously Concerned’ By Twitter Whistleblower’s Revelations

October 12, 2022 – Twitter is reportedly reviewing its policies around permanent user ban for serious guidelines violations, according to a report by Financial Times.

The social networking firm is exploring alternative content moderation tools that could replace the permanent ban it imposes as a penalty for certain violations on the platform. The FT report highlights Twitter could be “potentially bringing its content moderation more in line with Elon Musk’s vision for the social media platform”. Any change in the policies, however, are unlikely to allow former US president Donald Trump back on the platform, confirmed two insiders. 

Trump, who had over 88 million followers at the time, was banned from the platform following the January 6 US Capitol attack. Removing bans for violations of policy prohibiting incitement to violence is not under consideration, the insiders said.

“Instead, staffers are looking at areas where they feel Twitter may have been disproportionately heavy handed in cutting off users from its services for lesser offences, such as around the sharing of misleading information.”

Last week, Musk revived his $44 billion deal to acquire Twitter. The high-profile deal was proposed back in April, but the billionaire, who owns mega tech firms Tesla and SpaceX, had attempted to walk away just weeks later, citing, in his words, the executives’ misleading claims about the number of bot or spam accounts on the social networking platform. 

The controversial backout led to widespread media attention, with Twitter suing Musk over his failure to finalise the deal. However, two weeks before Twitter and Musk were scheduled for a legal showdown, the billionaire, in a surprise move, revived the deal, thereby averting what could turn into a highly publicised legal battle between Musk and one of the most influential social media platforms.

Musk, who calls himself a “free speech absolutist”, had earlier said Twitter would revise its moderation policies and move away from permanent bans if he acquired the platform. His free speech promises have raised concerns from experts and analysts, who are of the opinion the billionaire’s takeover of a platform like Twitter would not be a “free speech rights victory” as he would have more control over what should and should not be posted on the platform.

Tags: BanTwitter
Previous Post

Snapchat Rolling Out Parental Controls In India

Next Post

Meta vs The Wire: Everything you need to know

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

September 11, 2025
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

September 11, 2025
Afghan refugee children at Girdi Jungle refugee camp. Photo credits: Ramna Saeed

Pakistan blocks SIMS of Afghan refugees after deportation deadline

September 9, 2025
No Content Available

Next Post
Explainer: Meta vs The Wire

Meta vs The Wire: Everything you need to know

About Digital Rights Monitor

This website reports on digital rights and internet governance issues in Pakistan and collates related resources and publications. The site is a part of Media Matters for Democracy’s Report Digital Rights initiative that aims to improve reporting on digital rights issues through engagement with media outlets and journalists.

About Media Matters for Democracy

Media Matters for Democracy is a Pakistan based not-for-profit geared towards independent journalism and media and digital rights advocacy. Founded by a group of journalists, MMfD works for innovation in media and journalism through the use of technology, research, and advocacy on media and internet related issues. MMfD works to ensure that expression and information rights and freedoms are protected in Pakistan.

Follow Us on Twitter

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements