Thursday, September 25, 2025
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
No Result
View All Result

in DRM Exclusive, News

Meta Being Sued For Collecting Sensitive Patient Data From Hospitals

DRMby DRM
August 4, 2022
Facebook Parent Meta Releases First Human Rights Report

Photo: AP

August 4, 2022 – Facebook’s parent company Meta is being sued for allegedly collecting private medical information of millions of people from top US hospitals using the company’s data-tracking tool Meta Pixel.

According to the lawsuit, filed in the Northern District of California last week, a number of US hospitals used Pixel, a tool that accessed patients’ sensitive health data on their password-protected online portals. Meta then sold this data to advertisers, who used it for targeted treatment and medicine ads on the company’s biggest social media platform, Facebook.  

This is the second recent lawsuit accusing US hospitals and Meta of compromising people’s private medical profiles, violating the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The act bars health organisations from sharing personally identifiable health information with external entities without the patients’ consent. 

In June, an investigation by The Markup revealed that 33 of the 100 hospitals in the US use Pixel on their websites. The tracking tool was found installed on the password-protected portals of at least seven hospitals. Information related to health conditions, medical appointments, and medication of patients was being sent to Facebook through Pixel, the investigation found.

“Neither the hospitals nor Meta said they had such contracts in place, and The Markup found no evidence that the hospitals or Meta were otherwise obtaining patients’ express consent,” The Markup stated in its report. The nonprofit newsroom, however, added that it was unable to determine whether Facebook used the data to target advertisements, train its recommendation algorithms, or profit in other ways.

In one of the complaints, a Facebook user claims that she started receiving ads for medication related to her heart and knee conditions which she had entered in her portals on the websites of two hospitals (University of California, San Francisco Medical Centre and Health Dignity). 

Meta’s policy states that the company’s “filtering mechanism is designed to prevent potentially sensitive health-related data from being ingested into its ads ranking and optimisation systems”. However, Meta has been called out repeatedly for violating its own policies with controversial data-sharing practices. 

Tags: FacebookLawsuitMeta
Previous Post

Episode 03: Thou Shall Not Speak

Next Post

PEMRA Directs TV Channels To Stop Airing ‘Anti-State’ Content

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
NCCIA charges three YouTubers for promoting illegal gambling apps

NCCIA charges three YouTubers for promoting illegal gambling apps

September 25, 2025
Shaza Fatima says 5G rollout ‘months away’ despite internet disruptions

Shaza Fatima says 5G rollout ‘months away’ despite internet disruptions

September 24, 2025
Karachi man sentenced for 6 years for making a fake profile of a woman, uploading objectionable content after she rejected his proposal

Karachi man sentenced for 6 years for making a fake profile of a woman, uploading objectionable content after she rejected his proposal

September 23, 2025
No Content Available

Next Post
PEMRA Warns TV Channels Against Airing ‘Anti-State’ Content

PEMRA Directs TV Channels To Stop Airing ‘Anti-State’ Content

About Digital Rights Monitor

This website reports on digital rights and internet governance issues in Pakistan and collates related resources and publications. The site is a part of Media Matters for Democracy’s Report Digital Rights initiative that aims to improve reporting on digital rights issues through engagement with media outlets and journalists.

About Media Matters for Democracy

Media Matters for Democracy is a Pakistan based not-for-profit geared towards independent journalism and media and digital rights advocacy. Founded by a group of journalists, MMfD works for innovation in media and journalism through the use of technology, research, and advocacy on media and internet related issues. MMfD works to ensure that expression and information rights and freedoms are protected in Pakistan.

Follow Us on Twitter

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements