Saturday, September 13, 2025
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
No Result
View All Result

in DRM Exclusive, News

US court sanctions Google in privacy case

DRMby DRM
April 3, 2023
Google Sued Over ‘Unlawful’ Biometric Data Collection

Photo: DRM Archives

A US court has sanctioned Google for delaying compliance with a ruling issued in a data privacy class action last year.

The ruling is related to a high-profile case surrounding consumer claims that Google’s parent company Alphabet unlawfully tracked its users while they were using the Chrome browser in incognito or private mode. 

This is the second time in recent days that the search engine giant has suffered a legal setback. Google has been struggling to defend itself against increased regulatory scrutiny bringing forth the company’s questionable practices, including complaints of unlawful tracking and monopolising over the digital advertising market. 

In a separate ruling made last week, a California court concluded that Google had failed to preserve chat messages between employees in connection with an antitrust lawsuit filed by Epic Games. Though the court did not lay out immediate sanctions for Google in the ruling, it said it would later determine an amount to cover legal fees of the complainant’s lawyers. Google decided to contest the claims.

As for the privacy class action, Google defended itself by saying users of the Chrome browsers had consented to data collection by the company. “Countless documents and discovery” were provided by Google in the case, a company spokesperson said. This is not the first time Google has been sanctioned in the same case by the same judge. The previous sanctions order was issued in May 2022, which the company has apparently failed to adhere to. 

The latest order restricts Google from bringing certain employee witnesses to the case and directs the company to pay a $79,000 fine.

Google has been going through challenging times in terms of regulation across different global markets. Last week, Spain’s competition watchdog CNMC opened an inquiry into Google for possible anti-competitive licensing practices affecting publishers and news agencies. The reported practices included distorting free competition and enforcing unfair conditions on publishers and news agencies, according to the regulator.

In January, Google was sued by the US Justice Department and eight states for monopolising over the digital advertising market. The complaint accused Google of engaging in anti-competitive and exclusionary practices over the past 15 years to neutralise or eliminate ad tech competitors. In December, a US appeals court revived a case against Google for allegedly violating children’s privacy through its services.

In October, Google was taken to court by Texas on allegations of violating the state’s biometric laws without obtaining proper prior consent.

Earlier, the search engine giant was fined $161 million and $113 million in two separate antitrust probes conducted by the Competition Commission of India (CCI). 

Tags: Googleprivacy
Previous Post

Twitter blocks Pakistan govt’s account in India, again

Next Post

Australia bans TikTok on govt devices over security concerns

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

September 11, 2025
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

September 11, 2025
Afghan refugee children at Girdi Jungle refugee camp. Photo credits: Ramna Saeed

Pakistan blocks SIMS of Afghan refugees after deportation deadline

September 9, 2025
No Content Available

Next Post
TikTok fined over cookie consent violations

Australia bans TikTok on govt devices over security concerns

About Digital Rights Monitor

This website reports on digital rights and internet governance issues in Pakistan and collates related resources and publications. The site is a part of Media Matters for Democracy’s Report Digital Rights initiative that aims to improve reporting on digital rights issues through engagement with media outlets and journalists.

About Media Matters for Democracy

Media Matters for Democracy is a Pakistan based not-for-profit geared towards independent journalism and media and digital rights advocacy. Founded by a group of journalists, MMfD works for innovation in media and journalism through the use of technology, research, and advocacy on media and internet related issues. MMfD works to ensure that expression and information rights and freedoms are protected in Pakistan.

Follow Us on Twitter

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements