Tuesday, September 16, 2025
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
No Result
View All Result

in DRM Exclusive, News

Google to ‘delete’ browsing records to settle Incognito privacy lawsuit

DRMby DRM
April 2, 2024
Google to ‘delete’ browsing records to settle Incognito privacy lawsuit

Image: DRM Archives

Google will destroy billions of data records collected via its “Incognito” feature on the Chrome browser, which apparently allows “private” internet use, according to a report by Reuters.

The development comes after Google settled the class-action lawsuit for a staggering $5 billion in December 2023. However, according to the details disclosed in California federal court Monday, the search engine giant has agreed to “delete and/or remediate billions of data records that reflect class members’ private browsing activities”.

The lawsuit, brought in 2020, accused Google of tracking the activities of users despite them browsing the internet in its Incognito mode. The complaint said Google misled users into believing the Incognito mode ensured privacy online. No details regarding the settlement were disclosed then.

However, the company landed in hot waters after the case gained steam and Google’s privacy practices became a focal point of discussion across the international media. The lawsuit covered users from June 2016 and the case was filed under the California privacy and federal wiretapping laws. It not only accused Google of secretly harvesting user data through Chrome, but other browsers such as Safari, too.

The settlement obliges Google to publicly update users about the kind of data it gathers in private browsing. The search engine giant will also be required to allow people using the Incognito mode to block third-party cookies for five years. Google says it has already started working on the updates.

“The result is that Google will collect less data from users’ private browsing sessions, and that Google will make less money from the data,” said the complainants’ lawyers. They have termed the settlement “a historic step in requiring honesty and accountability from dominant technology companies”.

Google, on the other hand, said the company “never associates data with users” in the Incognito mode. “We are happy to delete old technical data that was never associated with an individual and was never used for any form of personalization,” a Google spokesperson said.

In August 2023, Google attempted to have the lawsuit dismissed, but the court ruled that the Google could not establish that users gave informed consent to the company to collect their data. “The Court is guided by the way that Google itself chose to represent its private browsing mode: Google told users that they could ‘go Incognito’ and ‘browse privately’,” the court order stated. Google’s request was rejected.

The lawsuit accused Google of spying on users’ activities like shopping, hobbies, information about their friends, and “potentially embarrassing things” they searched in the Incognito mode.

Tags: ChromeGoogle
Previous Post

US: Meta fails to block probe into Facebook privacy violations

Next Post

Israel banning Al Jazeera broadcast; network denounces move as ‘frantic campaign’

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

September 11, 2025
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

September 11, 2025
Afghan refugee children at Girdi Jungle refugee camp. Photo credits: Ramna Saeed

Pakistan blocks SIMS of Afghan refugees after deportation deadline

September 9, 2025
No Content Available

Next Post
Israel banning Al Jazeera broadcast; network denounces move as ‘frantic campaign’

Israel banning Al Jazeera broadcast; network denounces move as ‘frantic campaign’

About Digital Rights Monitor

This website reports on digital rights and internet governance issues in Pakistan and collates related resources and publications. The site is a part of Media Matters for Democracy’s Report Digital Rights initiative that aims to improve reporting on digital rights issues through engagement with media outlets and journalists.

About Media Matters for Democracy

Media Matters for Democracy is a Pakistan based not-for-profit geared towards independent journalism and media and digital rights advocacy. Founded by a group of journalists, MMfD works for innovation in media and journalism through the use of technology, research, and advocacy on media and internet related issues. MMfD works to ensure that expression and information rights and freedoms are protected in Pakistan.

Follow Us on Twitter

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements