Friday, September 12, 2025
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
No Result
View All Result

in News

BRAZIL: X accessible to many again after comms network update

DRMby DRM
September 18, 2024
BRAZIL: X accessible to many again after comms network update

X, which was blocked in Brazil last month on the orders of the Supreme Court, has become available again in the country after a recent update to its communications network, according to a report by Reuters.

The platform became accessible to many users again after it was blocked following a highly publicised feud between X owner and billionaire Elon Musk and Brazilian Supreme Court Judge Alexandre de Moraes. The flaring spat began following official investigations into X’s content moderation practices. 

X (formerly Twitter) was accused of spreading misinformation and hate speech in the country and the Supreme Court ordered the platform to block certain accounts. Musk, who used harsh words — including “evil dictator” and “tyrant” — for Justice Moraes, informed his followers on X that the company had been forced to take down the flagged accounts without any justification. The reported accounts were subsequently blocked after X sent out notifications to them about the takedown. 

Musk levelled allegations against the Brazilian authorities that they harassed the company’s legal representative and froze her bank accounts, forcing her to leave the country. When Judge de Moraes ordered X to designate a new legal representative, Musk refused to comply with the directives, and launched a barrage of criticism against the judge, labelling his actions “censorship”. 

After the deadline to name a new legal representative expired, the Supreme Court ordered X to be blocked. Musk, however, told users they could still use the platform via virtual private networks (VPNs). The court, on the other hand, warned against the use of VPNs, announcing fines for those who would be found using them. The use of VPNs to access X has been penalised with a fine worth up to $9,000 a day in Brazil. 

However, when X became accessible to a number of users after the update this week, the Supreme Court sprung into action again. It has warned X not to circumvent the blockage and has imposed a fine of $921,726 on the platform already. The penalty will pile up daily if X continues to operate in the country. 

“There is no doubt that X, under Elon Musk’s direct command, again intends to disrespect Brazil’s Judiciary,” Justice Moraes stated in his latest order issued on Wednesday. His remarks suggested that X had a “strategy” to work around the continuing suspension. According to X, however, the restoration of the platform was a result of a switch in network providers, which led to an “inadvertent and temporary service restoration”.

The company says efforts to restore the platform in the country are under way and that X’s services will be back on in Brazil “very soon”.

The law in Brazil requires tech companies to have a legal representative in the country.

More on Elon Musk and Justice Alexandre de Moraes’ flaring feud here

Tags: BrazilX
Previous Post

Instagram launches ‘private’ accounts for teenagers

Next Post

DRM Weekly Review (Sept 16 – 19, 2024)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

PTA denies role in massive data leak, says 1,372 sites blocked

September 11, 2025
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police crack down on TikTokers for ‘promoting obscenity’

September 11, 2025
Afghan refugee children at Girdi Jungle refugee camp. Photo credits: Ramna Saeed

Pakistan blocks SIMS of Afghan refugees after deportation deadline

September 9, 2025
No Content Available

Next Post
DRM – Week in Review

DRM Weekly Review (Sept 16 - 19, 2024)

About Digital Rights Monitor

This website reports on digital rights and internet governance issues in Pakistan and collates related resources and publications. The site is a part of Media Matters for Democracy’s Report Digital Rights initiative that aims to improve reporting on digital rights issues through engagement with media outlets and journalists.

About Media Matters for Democracy

Media Matters for Democracy is a Pakistan based not-for-profit geared towards independent journalism and media and digital rights advocacy. Founded by a group of journalists, MMfD works for innovation in media and journalism through the use of technology, research, and advocacy on media and internet related issues. MMfD works to ensure that expression and information rights and freedoms are protected in Pakistan.

Follow Us on Twitter

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Comment
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements