Friday, March 24, 2023
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements
No Result
View All Result
Digital Rights Monitor
No Result
View All Result

in DRM Exclusive, Features

Joint statement condemns Wikipedia ban in Pakistan

Usman ShahidbyUsman Shahid
February 6, 2023
PTA degrades Wikipedia services over ‘sacrilegious content’

Photo: Online

Civil society, tech organisations and academic institutions have signed a joint statement condemning the blocking of Wikipedia by the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA). Wikipedia was banned in the country on February 3 after the platform apparently failed to remove content that had been labelled “sacrilegious” by the telecom regulator.

The statement has been signed by 72 organisations from civil society and the business community, 15 representatives from universities, and 24 citizen stakeholders from across Pakistan. It terms the ban on Wikipedia a violation of Article 19 of the Constitution, and expresses concern regarding the implications of the PTA’s extreme measure on students and information workers. 

Media Matters for Democracy (MMfD), which runs Digital Rights Monitor (DRM), is one of the leading signatories to the statement.

The statement, which calls for the restoration of Wikipedia, highlights the severity and arbitrary nature of the ban by reiterating the pending status of Removal and Blocking of Unlawful Online Content (Procedure, Oversight and Safeguards) Rules, 2021, commonly referred to as “Social Media Rules”, which were sent to the Parliament for review by the Islamabad High Court (IHC) in May 2022. Despite there not being significant development, both PTA and the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) continue to take regressive measures under the controversial regulations, along with Section 37 (unlawful online content) of the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2016, also known as PECA. The laws have frequently been misused against journalists, TV channels and online platforms.

“It is expected that the ban on Wikipedia will severely impact the ability of Pakistani freelancers and businesses to provide globally competitive services and earn precious foreign exchange for the country,” the statement reads. 

Earlier, the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit group that runs Wikipedia, said the crowd-sourced encyclopedia receives more than 50 million page views a month from Pakistan alone. The stunning number highlights the popularity of Wikipedia as a preferred source of information by a large number of internet users in the country and illustrates the adverse impacts its ban could demonstrate on Pakistani audiences.

On February 1, the PTA announced that Wikipedia services had been “degraded” in Pakistan for “not removing/blocking sacrilegious content”. A 48-hour deadline was issued to the encyclopedia with the regulator threatening to block the platform completely in case of “non-compliance”. The PTA claimed that Wikipedia had been given “an opportunity of hearing”, but it neither took down the reported content nor appeared before the regulator.

“Students and professionals from across the country can attest to the positive role the platform has had on their work, facilitating education and knowledge-sharing, particularly for people who do not have alternative enabling resources to purchase books and access websites behind paywalls,” the statement adds. “This ban will disproportionately impact the most marginalized among us, creating a monopoly of knowledge for the elite and cause an unjust exclusion from co-creation of information and knowledge in various fields of human endeavours in thought, invention and discovery.”

The statement has called for the restoration of Wikipedia services raising the hashtag #SaveWikipedia and for legal action against state authorities for continuing to misuse laws while they are under review.

Tags: PakistanWikipedia
Previous Post

Twitter to charge businesses $1,000 to stay verified: reports

Next Post

PTA lifts ban on Wikipedia

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
TikTok CEO testifies before US lawmakers

TikTok CEO testifies before US lawmakers

March 24, 2023
TURKEY: Using the disinformation law as a weapon

TURKEY: Using the disinformation law as a weapon

March 22, 2023
Meta fined $275m over EU data breach

Facebook content moderators suing Meta in Kenya

March 21, 2023
No Content Available

Next Post
PTA lifts ban on Wikipedia

PTA lifts ban on Wikipedia

About Digital Rights Monitor

This website reports on digital rights and internet governance issues in Pakistan and collates related resources and publications. The site is a part of Media Matters for Democracy’s Report Digital Rights initiative that aims to improve reporting on digital rights issues through engagement with media outlets and journalists.

About Media Matters for Democracy

Media Matters for Democracy is a Pakistan based not-for-profit geared towards independent journalism and media and digital rights advocacy. Founded by a group of journalists, MMfD works for innovation in media and journalism through the use of technology, research, and advocacy on media and internet related issues. MMfD works to ensure that expression and information rights and freedoms are protected in Pakistan.

Follow Us on Twitter

No Result
View All Result
  • DRM Exclusive
    • News
    • Court Updates
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Campaigns
      • #PrivacyHumSabKe
    • Vodcasts
  • In Media
    • News
    • OP-EDs
  • Editorial
  • Gender & Tech
    • SheConnects
  • Trends Monitor
  • Infographics
  • Resources
    • Laws and Policies
    • Research
    • International Frameworks
  • DRM Advocacy
    • Exclusives
    • Featured
    • Publications
    • Statements

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist